Legal Opinion

1000 Friends of Oregon v. Jackson Co.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 23, 1986No. 85-081; CA A38834PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA’s affirmance of an amendment to Jackson County’s acknowledged comprehensive plan map. The amendment changed the designation of 1000 acres of forest land from forest resource (FR) to the less restrictive woodland resource (WR) designation. Both designations are defined in the county’s plan. Petitioner’s basic contention before LUBA was that the amendment violates Goal 4.

LUBA’s opinion states, in part:

“* * * [Petitioner argues the county erroneously applied its plan to this change instead of Goal 4. In making this argument, petitioner explains that the county…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Byrd v. StringerOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Ludwick v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Colwell v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Curry Co.)Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Urquhart v. Lane Council of GovernmentsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. Ramsey v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. Apalategui v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API