Peterson v. Gibbs
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment and from an order of the Superior Court of Mendocino County denying a new trial. J. M. Mannon, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an appeal from the judgment and an order denying a motion for a new trial. The trial' court granted the defendants’ motion for a nonsuit, and judgment was thereupon entered that the plaintiff take nothing by his action and that defendants recover their costs.
The principal question presented is as to the action of the-court in granting defendants’ motion for a nonsuit.
The action was commenced July 19,1901, to quiet plaintiff’s; title to certain land in Mendocino County. Plaintiff alleged in his complaint that on July 18, 1891, one Oppenlander was. the owner in fee simple of said land;…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Castro v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Pennie v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Sears v. AckermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Bulwer Consolidated Mining Co. v. Standard Consolidated Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1890
- Purner v. PiercyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Rosenfeld v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Friends of the Trails v. BlasiusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Davis v. CrumpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Warren v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Palmer v. WahlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.