Rosenfeld v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
MARIA-ELENA JAMES, United States Chief Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Before the Court is Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”), California Reconveyance Company (“CRC”), and Bank of America, N.A.’s 1 (“BofA”) (collectively “Defendants”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint. (Dkt. # 10.) After consideration of the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS as follows.
II. BACKGROUND
In late July 2006, Plaintiff Paul E. Rosenfeld (“Plaintiff”) obtained a…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Jolley v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Rockridge Trust v. Wells Fargo, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Scott v. JPMorgan Chase BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Reinhardt v. Gemini Motor TransportDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2012
- Sikhs for Justice "SFJ", Inc. v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.