Davis v. Crump
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of nonsuit of the Superior Court of Alameda County. T. W. Harris, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an action to quiet plaintiff’s alleged title in fee to a tract of land containing some 16.75 acres described in the complaint as being situate in the county of Alameda, state of California, and sufficiently shown by the evidence to be in the city of Oakland in said county. There were exceeding one hundred defendants. The defendants answered, setting up their respective claims. At the trial, plaintiff having introduced his evidence and rested, a motion for a nonsuit, based upon seventeen grounds, was granted. Judgment of nonsuit was thereupon given. This is an appeal by plaintiff from…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- In Re the Estate of ArnoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Payne & Dewey v. TreadwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Castro v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Freese v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Brumagim v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- United States v. Michael Gilbert, Karen Gilbert, Michael Gilbert Family Irrevocable Trust, Third Party Claimants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Birch v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Pettengill v. BlackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
- Hammitt v. Virginia Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1919
- Babcock v. DangerfieldUtah Supreme Court · 1939
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.