Bulwer Consolidated Mining Co. v. Standard Consolidated Mining Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mono County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
Action to quiet title to a mining claim in Mono County, brought under section 738 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Each party is a California corporation.
The complaint is in the usual form of complaints under said section, and describes a strip of land 1,188 feet in length, containing two acres, “known as the Ralston No. 1 north mine or vein, .... being mineral entry No. 48 in the series of the land-office at Bodie, in said *593state, designated by the surveyor-general as lot No. 44,” of which the plaintiff alleges that it is the oivner, and in possession, 4‘ with exclusive right of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Miller v. LucoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Wilson v. MadisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Germania Building & Loan Ass'n v. WagnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Pfister v. DasceyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by26 opinions
- The Title & Document Restoration Co. v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Peterson v. GibbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Warren v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- California Oil & Gas Co. of Arizona v. MillerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1899
- In re Davis' EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1891
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.