Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Wahler

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 1955No. Civ. 8548PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINLEY, J. pro tem. *

In this action, tried before a jury, plaintiff was awarded a money judgment on an alleged oral contract whereby, for a fee, he undertook to and did procure a purchaser of standing timber in which defendants owned an undivided interest. Defendants have appealed from the judgment and urged the following points of reversal:

“I. The evidence produced at the trial of the action by the plaintiff is insufficient either (A) to support the verdict of the jury and the judgment of the court finding that defendants were indebted to plaintiff by reason of an oral agreement entered into…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Peterson v. GibbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Freeman v. JerginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Shaffer v. BeinhornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Hewel v. HoginCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Tenzer v. Superscope, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Tyrone v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Paullus v. YARBROUGH ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Davidson v. RobieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  5. Drewry v. WelchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API