Legal Opinion

Westerfeld v. New York Life Ins. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1910No. S.F. No. 4049PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

This case comes before the court for the second time. The first appeals were by defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, and from an order denying a motion for new trial. Both judgment and order were reversed by this court. (Westerfeld v. New York Life Ins. Co., 129 Cal. 68, [58 Pac. 92, 61 Pac. 667].) The appeals were first considered in Department, and again, after a rehearing, in Bank. The two opinions filed show most of the facts of the case sufficiently for the purposes of this appeal. Such additional facts-as require consideration will be stated in the course of this-, opinion.

A…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Tally v. GanahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Gould v. Cayuga County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Westerfeld v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Montgomery v. McLauryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Deacon v. BlodgetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. BoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Steelduct Co. v. Henger-Seltzer Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Wells v. LloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. United Dredging Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API