Legal Opinion

United Dredging Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 1930No. Docket Nos. S.F. 13634, 13635PublishedCited by 54 opinions

R. P. Wisecarver and Redman & Alexander for Petitioners. G. C. Faulkner and Edward O. Allen for Respondents.

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

Petitioners seek by certiorari and mandamus to compel the Industrial Accident Commission to reopen a proceeding previously determined by it under the authority of section 20d of the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Stats. 1917, p. 850), and to annul its award of a death benefit made in said proceeding in favor of Ollie Kopke, the widow of Joseph Kopke, who was drowned while in the employ of petitioner United Dredging Company, for which petitioner Ocean Accident and Guarantee Company is the insurance carier. The parties have stipulated that the petitions for review and mandamus should be heard,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Cadillac Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  2. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Mangold v. BaconSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  4. Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Bartlett Hayward Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. People v. ShueyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Penziner v. West American Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Wells v. LloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API