Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. McLaury

California Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1904No. L.A. No. 1198PublishedCited by 19 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.

This is a litigation arising out of the alleged fraud of the defendants, C. S. and J. L. McLaury, in inducing the plaintiffs by false representations to exchange their Minnesota farm for thirty-five acres of land in Riverside County in this state. The defendants appeal from a judgment canceling a mortgage on the Riverside land, and awarding damages in the sum of eighteen hundred dollars. Thejr also appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial.

The agreement for the exchange of lands, and the deeds, mortgage, note, etc., by which it was effected, were made and executed in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Yeomans v. . BellNew York Court of Appeals · 1896

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Murphy v. SheftelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Hodgkins v. DunhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
  3. Karapetian v. CarolanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Martin v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Walsh v. MajorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API