Montgomery v. McLaury
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
This is a litigation arising out of the alleged fraud of the defendants, C. S. and J. L. McLaury, in inducing the plaintiffs by false representations to exchange their Minnesota farm for thirty-five acres of land in Riverside County in this state. The defendants appeal from a judgment canceling a mortgage on the Riverside land, and awarding damages in the sum of eighteen hundred dollars. Thejr also appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The agreement for the exchange of lands, and the deeds, mortgage, note, etc., by which it was effected, were made and executed in…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Yeomans v. . BellNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
3Cited by19 opinions
- Murphy v. SheftelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Hodgkins v. DunhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Karapetian v. CarolanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Martin v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Walsh v. MajorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.