Estate of Cazaurang
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
Motion for substitution of attorneys. Petitioner has moved this court in the matter of an appeal pending herein for a substitution of A. G. Reily as attorney in the place and stead of her present attorneys, Gray, Cary, Ames & Driscoll. Her affidavit contains a long recital of alleged grievances not necessary to here repeat. The attorneys of record have filed herein affidavits and exhibits in opposition to the motion for substitution of attorneys herein, apparently with the idea of refuting the charges contained in the papers filed by petitioner. We are not at liberty to weigh the reasons…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gage v. AtwaterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Todd v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Scott v. Superior Court of Alameda CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Woodbury v. Nevada Southern RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Jacobus v. JacobusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by14 opinions
- Champion v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Estate of CazaurangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Aviles v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & ScrippsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Estate of KerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Houghton v. CoberlyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.