Woodbury v. Nevada Southern Railway
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County substituting attorneys for the corporation defendant and from an order refusing to vacate the same. Lueien Shaw, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The Nevada Southern Railway Company, the defendant in the above-entitled action, made its application to the superior court for the substitution of M. W. Conkling as its attorney of record therein, in the place of A. B. Hotchkiss, and the court made its order for such substitution. From this order, and from a subsequent order refusing to set it aside, the present appeal has been taken.
'Whether the request for the substitution of attorneys that was presented to the superior court was made by the defendant was a question of fact for that court to determine, 'and its conclusion that it…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People ex rel. Downer v. NortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Lee v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gage v. AtwaterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Scott v. Superior Court of Alameda CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Estate of CazaurangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Telander v. TelanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Sucesión Lluveras v. SepúlvedaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.