Legal Opinion

Aviles v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps

California Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1966No. L. A. No. 28301PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

This is an appeal from an order (1) fixing attorneys fees under a contingent fee agreement executed by the beneficiary named in a document admitted to probate as the last will and testament of decedent, Mrs. Sue B. Kerr, and (2) giving the attorneys a lien on the assets of the estate to secure payment of such fees. We have concluded that the trial court correctly construed and applied the agreement, and that its order should be affirmed.

The parties agree that in August 1961 decedent made a *877will, apparently executing two duplicate originals thereof, in which she provided in pertinent part: “I…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Houge v. FordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. In Re Estate of HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Firebaugh v. BurbankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Estate of RaphaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Arnall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Gelfand, Greer, Popko & Miller v. ShivenerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. Estate of KerrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Estate of MuhammadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Fount-Wip, Inc. v. GolsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API