Todd v. Superior Court of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel the granting of a motion for substitution of attorneys in a probate proceeding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.
Application for a writ of mandate. On April 28, 1919, the petitioners herein filed an application for a writ of mandate to be directed against the respondents, the court having refused to grant a motion made by the petitioners for the substitution of attorneys in the matter of the estate of Christine Sharbach, deceased. On May 1, 1919, an alternative writ of mandate was issued by this court, and on June 2, 1919, the respondents interposed a demurrer to the petition on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action for a writ of mandate. At the same time the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hunt v. Rousmanier's AdministratorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Wylie v. CoxeSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Wood v. StrotherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Frink v. RoeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Gage v. AtwaterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- People v. OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Isrin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- White v. AikenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
- Echlin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.