Charles Vernon Floyd, Jr. & Sons, Inc. v. Cape Fear Farm Credit, ACA
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MITCHELL, Chief Justice.
The sole question presented for review is whether the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction to decide whether the trial court erred when it granted defendant’s motion to compel election, forcing plaintiffs to choose between their claims for breach of contract and unfair or deceptive practices 1 during the trial of this case. The Court of Appeals held it was without jurisdiction to determine this issue. For the reasons that follow, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.
The record reveals that the following evidence was before the trial court. Charles Vernon Floyd,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Bailey v. GoodingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Travco Hotels, Inc. v. PIEDMONT NAT. GAS CO., INC.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- Moose v. Nissan of Statesville, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
- Talbert v. MauneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gaunt v. PittawayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Department of Transportation v. RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Brooks v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Yorke v. Novant Health, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Inman v. InmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.