Legal Opinion

Inman v. Inman

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 2000No. COA98-1029PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORTON, Judge.

On appeal, plaintiff argues one question: “Does the separation agreement and property settlement as written bar the defendant from claiming equitable distribution in property acquired after a reconciliation?”

We first note that plaintiff did not object-to the 11 June 1997 order of the trial court ruling that the separation and property settlement agreement did not bar defendant from seeking equitable distribution of property acquired by the parties after their reconciliation. Our Supreme Court has recently ruled that, if an interlocutory order is entered during the pendency of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Weil v. . HerringSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Barbour v. LittleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Barbour v. LittleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Matter of PeirceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Hall v. MabeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gaunt v. PittawayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Dixon v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  3. Kane v. North Carolina Teachers' & State Employees' Comprehensive Major Medical PlanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. Inman v. InmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Myers v. McGradyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API