Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 29, 2000No. COA99-430PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN, Judge.

Defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart) appeals judgment entered upon jury verdict in favor of plaintiff Robert F. Brooks. We conclude the trial court committed no error.

Pertinent facts and procedural history include the following: Defendant James L. Deterding, M.D. (Dr. Deterding), an employee of defendant Carolina Kidney Associates, P.A. (CKA), began treating plaintiff in October 1991. On 11 September 1992, Dr. Deterding prescribed the drug Prednisone (the prescription) for plaintiffs loss of kidney function. Dr. Deterding intended that the prescription reflect a dosage of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. State v. HennisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  4. J & B Slurry Seal Co. v. Mid-South Aviation, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Food Town Stores, Inc. v. City of SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Troyer v. AdamsHawaii Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Yorke v. Novant Health, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Cox v. SteffesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Pitts v. Nash Day Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Tinajero v. Balfour Beatty Infrastructure, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API