Legal Opinion

Department of Transportation v. Rowe

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 3, 1999No. 506PA98PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Justice.

The issue in this case is whether defendants Joe C. Rowe, Sharon B. Rowe, Howard L. Pruitt, and Georgia M. Pruitt (“defendants”) 1 were required to immediately appeal the trial court’s orders from a condemnation hearing unifying their four remaining tracts of land. We hold that the interlocutory orders did not affect a substantial right of defendants and that defendants were not required to immediately appeal the trial court’s orders.

Defendants owned 18.123 acres of land located in Catawba County, North Carolina. On 26 June 1995 plaintiff North Carolina Department of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Waters v. Qualified Personnel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. Tridyn Industries, Inc. v. American Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Greene v. Charlotte Chemical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. City of Raleigh v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. McCutchen v. McCutchenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  3. Meherrin Indian Tribe v. LewisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. Trillium Ridge Condominium Ass'n v. Trillium Links & Village, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. North Carolina Department of Transportation v. Stagecoach VillageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API