Legal Opinion
Stratavest Ltd. v. Rogers
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 16, 1995No. 94 Civ. 9305 (RWS)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Stratavest Ltd. (“Stratavest”), Joseph Chervin (“Chervin”) and Suzanne Chervin, moved for an order pursuant to Canons 4 and 9 of the ABA Model Code of Professional Responsibility and the New York Code of Professional Responsibility, disqualifying the law firm of Baer Marks & Upham (“BMU”) from further representing the defendants Walter L. Rogers (“Rogers”), Belgrave Investment Trust, N.V. (“BIT”), St. Jean Financial, Inc. (“St. Jean”) and Cambridge Phase II Corp. (“Cambridge”) (collectively the “Rogers Defendants”) in this action. For the reasons…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- S & S Hotel Ventures Limited Partnership v. 777 S. H. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
- The Nck Organization Ltd. And William E. Greene, Jr. v. Walter W. BregmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Allegaert v. PerotCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States Football League v. National Football LeagueDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Kubin v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bowens v. Atlantic Maintenance Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Prout v. VladeckDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- First Interregional Advisors Corp. v. WolffDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Shabbir v. Pakistan International AirlinesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Post-Confirmation Committee of Unsecured Creditors of I Successor Corp. v. Feld Group, Inc. (In Re I Successor Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.