United States Football League v. National Football League
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER *
LEISURE, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this action 1 have moved to disqualify counsel for the defendants, 2 Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison (“Paul, Weiss”). The sheer number 3 and volume of the submissions on this motion are indicative of the complexity and importance of the issues the motion raises. A disqualification motion calls into question the ethics of attorneys, who are after all officers of the Court; reflects the movant’s concern with safeguarding the confidentiality of information imparted to its former counsel; and raises the possibility that a litigant…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- The Government of India and the Food Corporation of India v. Cook Industries, Inc. And Cook and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Hull v. Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- Alexander v. Primerica Holdings, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Koch v. Koch IndustriesDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992
- Bowens v. Atlantic Maintenance Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Bennett Silvershein Associates v. FurmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Papanicolaou v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.