S & S Hotel Ventures Limited Partnership v. 777 S. H. Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*440OPINION OF THE COURT
Kaye, J.
The advocate-witness disqualification rules contained in the Code of Professional Responsibility provide guidance, not binding authority, for courts in determining whether a party’s law firm, at its adversary’s instance, should be disqualified during litigation. Courts must, in addition, consider such factors as the party’s valued right to choose its own counsel, and the fairness and effect in the particular factual setting of granting disqualification or continuing representation. Concluding that the court below failed to exercise any discretion, and that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Teitelbaum Holdings, Ltd. v. GoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Borman v. BormanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Comden v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Mtr. of Abrams (John Anonymous)New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- In re the Estate of WeinstockNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by311 opinions
- Tekni-Plex, Inc. v. Meyner & LandisNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Purgess v. SharrockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Purgess v. SharrockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Solow v. W. R. Grace & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Niesig v. Team INew York Court of Appeals · 1990
306 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.