Legal Opinion
First Interregional Advisors Corp. v. Wolff
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 21, 1997No. 95 Civ. 8725(DC)PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
CHIN, District Judge.
In this case brought by First Interregional Advisors Corp. (“FIAC”) pursuant to the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq. (“RICO”), defendants Emanuel Wolff (“Wolff’), Slovie Wolff, Mark Karasick, Raehell Skydell, Manhattan Management, Inc., Chadwick Funding Company and Burham Corp., N.V. (collectively, the “Wolff Defendants”) move pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 9(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss the complaint. The Wolff Defendants challenge the sufficiency of almost every aspect of FIAC’s…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Holmes v. Securities Investor Protection CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Reves v. Ernst & YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Odyssey Re (London) Ltd. v. Stirling Cooke Brown Holdings Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Lippe v. Bairnco Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- A v. by Versace, Inc. v. Gianni Versace, S.P.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Allstate Insurance v. RozenbergDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Fuji Photo Film U.S.A., Inc. v. McNultyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.