Legal Opinion
New Milford Savings Bank v. Jajer
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 31, 1998No. SC 15695PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
The issue in this appeal is whether General Statutes §§ 49-15 and 49-11 deprive the Superior *253Court of jurisdiction to open a foreclosure judgment in order to correct the inadvertent omission of a parcel of the mortgaged property from the judgment. The plaintiff, the New Milford Savings Bank (bank), brought an uncontested action against the defendants Maurice and Maria Jajer,2 for foreclosure of a mortgage that they had executed as security for a $270,000 loan. Although the mortgage conveyance included three parcels of land, two vacant parcels and a third parcel containing the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. HirschfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Delahunty v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Duhaime v. American Reserve Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Conference Center Ltd. v. TRC—The Research Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Fahy v. FahySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Thompson v. OrcuttSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- RMS Residential Properties, LLC v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Chase Home Finance, LLC v. FequiereConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Town of Ridgefield v. Eppoliti Realty Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- In Re Van EckUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.