Legal Opinion
Williams v. Commission On Human Rights & Opportunities
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 7, 2001No. SC 16249PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The principal issue in this certified appeal is whether the 180 day time requirement for filing a complaint with the named defendant commission on human rights and opportunities (commission) pursuant *260to General Statutes § 46a-82 (e)1 is subject matter jurisdictional. Following our grant of certification to appeal,2 the commission3 appeals from the judgment of the Appellate Court, which affirmed the judgment of the trial court dismissing the disability discrimination complaint filed by the plaintiff, Terry Ann Williams. The *261Appellate Court determined that because the plaintiff…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Ambroise v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Bridgeport Hospital v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- LeConche v. ElligersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Thibodeau v. Design Group One Architects, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Lostritto v. Community Action Agency of New Haven, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Rayhall v. Akim Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Fedus v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.