Legal Opinion

Gore v. People's Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 10, 1995No. 15042PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKatz, J.

The primary question on this certified appeal is whether the Appellate Court properly concluded that a landlord of a residential dwelling may be held strictly hable pursuant to General Statutes (Rev. to 1985) §§ 47a-7, 47a-8 and 47a-54f (b)1 for personal injuries *363sustained by a minor tenant due to the minor’s exposure to lead-based paint in the landlord’s dwelling. The plaintiffs, Thomas Gore and Wanda Copeland, brought an action on behalf of their minor son, Kendall Copeland, claiming, inter alia, that the defendants, People’s Savings Bank and M.S.B. Real Estate Corporation, were strictly…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. White v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Buckman v. People Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Lauer v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  4. Panaroni v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  5. Wright v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Sikora v. WenzelOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. Cook v. Whitsell-ShermanIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Considine v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. Rumbin v. Utica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API