Legal Opinion

Salt Lake City Mission v. Salt Lake City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 2008No. 20060962PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Justice:

T1 Appellants Salt Lake City Mission and Wayne Wilson claim that Salt Lake City and various of its officers and employees have violated the Mission's religious freedom under both the Utah and federal constitutions. We hold that the Mission's claims under the Utah Constitution were properly dismissed because the Mission failed to exhaust its administrative remedies. We further hold that the Mission's claims under the federal constitution are not ripe, and were thus also properly dismissed. We therefore affirm the decision of the district court.

BACKGROUND

12 Salt Lake City…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Anderson v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Nebeker v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Patterson v. American Fork CityUtah Supreme Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Adoption B.B. v. R.K.B.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Raab v. Utah Railway Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Frito-Lay v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Ramsay v. Kane County Human Resource Special Service DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Backbone Worldwide Inc. v. Lifevantage Corp.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API