Legal Opinion
Raab v. Utah Railway Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Decided September 18, 2009No. 20080151, 20080184PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DURRANT, Associate Chief Justice:
INTRODUCTION
T1 This case comes to us on appeal from the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant Utah Railway on plaintiff Scott Raab's negligence claims brought under the Federal Employers Liability Act ("FELA") and the Federal Locomotive Inspection Act ("FLIA"). 1 Raab seeks recovery for injuries suffered when he struck his head on an after-market air conditioning unit installed in one of Utah Railway's locomotives. In his complaint, Raab alleges that Utah Railway was negligent in (1) allowing its train to run with a lead locomotive…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- USA Power, LLC v. PacifiCorpUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- Penunuri v. Sundance Partners, Ltd.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
- Smith v. Volkswagen SouthtowneUtah Supreme Court · 2022
- Barneck v. Utah Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- Dee v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.