Legal Opinion

Nebeker v. Utah State Tax Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 2001No. 990835, 20000834PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURRANT, Justice:

{ 1 The Utah State Tax Commission determined that Jim Nebeker d/b/a Jim Nebeker Trucking was deficient in payment of the Utah Special Fuel Tax and imposed a twelve percent interest rate on the amount Nebeker owed. Nebeker filed suit against the Tax Commission in district court alleging the twelve percent interest rate imposed in the initial Tax Commission proceeding violated the Utah Constitution. The trial court dismissed the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. Nebeker again challenged the constitutionality of the twelve percent interest rate in a second proceeding before…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Public Util. Comm'n of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. MacRis & Associates, Inc. v. Neways, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. SprolesIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Jeffries v. Glacier State Telephone Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Coleman Ex Rel. Schefski v. StevensUtah Supreme Court · 2000

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. MacK v. Utah State Department of CommerceUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Associated General Contractors v. Board of Oil, Gas & MiningUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. ABCO Enterprises v. Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Café Rio, Inc. v. Larkin-Gifford-Overton, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2009

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API