Ramsay v. Kane County Human Resource Special Service District
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Associate Chief Justice NEHRING,
opinion of the Court:
INTRODUCTION
¶ 1 Plaintiffs Lori Ramsay and Dan Small-ing sued various parties based on the alleged failure of their employer, Kane County Hospital, to fund their retirement benefits at the level required by the Utah State Retirement and Insurance Benefit Act. The district court dismissed Plaintiffs’ claims for lack of jurisdiction because Plaintiffs conceded they had not exhausted their administrative remedies. The court of appeals reversed the dismissal and ordered that the case be stayed pending resolution of the existing administrative…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Varian-Eimac, Inc. v. LamoreauxCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
- State v. LevinUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- MacK v. Utah State Department of CommerceUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- Housing Authority v. PapandreaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Housing Authority, County of Salt Lake v. SnyderUtah Supreme Court · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Mind & Motion Utah Investments, LLC v. Celtic Bank Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2016
- Adoption B.B. v. R.K.B.Utah Supreme Court · 2017
- Salt Lake City v. CarreraUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- Migliore v. Livingston Financial, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- Oliver v. Utah Labor Comm'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.