State v. Banks
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
The warrant upon which the prosecution is based is before us as a part of the record proper. We are.charged with notice of its contents. If the warrant is insufficient on its face to state a criminal charge and support a conviction, the Court, ex mero mo tu, should so declare, and arrest the judgment. “It is an essential of jurisdiction that a criminal offense shall be sufficiently charged in a warrant or an indictment.” “. . . ‘The authorities are in unison that an indictment, ... to be good must- allege lucidly and accurately all the essential elements of the offense endeavored to be…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State v. BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. BivinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- State v. PetersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
3Cited by17 opinions
- Matter of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. KirbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. PorthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. SwaneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.