Legal Opinion

State v. Bass

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 9, 1960No. 292PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, C. J.

At the outset of this appeal counsel for the accused, conceding for sake of argument that the defendant’s confession was voluntary, contends that “a naked extra-judicial confession uncorroborated by independent evidence and proof of corpus delicti, is insufficient to sustain a conviction of the crime charged.” In other words, the defendant contends the case should have been nonsuited because, even if the confession were admissible, there was not, as a matter of law, sufficient evidence aliunde the confession to carry the case to the jury. G.S. 15-173.

In Wharton’s Criminal Evidence (12th Ed.),…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. . HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. State v. PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. State v. CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. State v. . GoodsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. State v. . ReitzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. SilhanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Matter of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. CaddellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API