Legal Opinion

State v. Bivins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant has expressly abandoned all of his assignments of error except those based on his motion for nonsuit.

The evidence for the State is sufficient for the jury to find these facts: Defendant had on July 16, 1963 partaken of alcoholic beverages. Between 8:30 and 9:00 p.m. he parked his car across the street from the home of Othol Jackson. He got out of the car, crossed the street, and went to a window in the bedroom of the Jackson home. The room was *94occupied by Jackson and his wife. She was on the bed adjacent to the window. There was a wire screen in the window and on the inside of the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API