Legal Opinion
Nobers v. Crucible, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 25, 1988No. 1251PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPOVICH, Judge:
This is an appeal from the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Beaver County granting the preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer as to jurisdiction against the appellants/plaintiffs (David A. Nobers, Robert R. Campbell, Jr., Gasper P. Porto and Gary T. Weekly, *158individually, and on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated). We reverse.
Since review of the sustainment of preliminary objections in the nature of demurrer is sought, the well-pleaded factual allegations set forth in the complaint are to be regarded as true. Itri v. Equibank, N.A., 318…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Safeguard Mutual Insurance v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Mazzagatti v. Everingham by EveringhamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Lukus v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Thompson v. Karastan Rug MillsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Albert v. Lehigh Coal & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- 1975 Salaried Retirement Plan for Eligible Employees of Crucible, Inc. v. NobersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- 1975 Salaried Retirement Plan for Eligible Employees of Crucible, Inc. v. NobersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Nobers v. Crucible, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994