Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Karastan Rug Mills

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 21, 1974No. Appeal, 250PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hoffman, J.,

This is an appeal from the order of the court below granting defendant’s motion for judgment n.o.Y. following a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff.

Wayne-Weil Company, a retail carpet outlet, sold and installed wall-to-wall carpeting in appellant’s home. When payment was not forthcoming, Wayne-Weil instituted an action in assumpsit in the Common Pleas Court of Allegheny County. Appellant raised the defense that the carpet was defective and unmerchantable. Mr. Thompson, further counter-claimed for damages incurred during the installation of the carpets. After taking…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Kassab v. SoyaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Posternack v. Am. Cas. Co. of ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Stevenson v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Thorsen v. Iron and Glass BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Day v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Little v. v. & G Welding Supply, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Carr v. RoseDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API