Legal Opinion

Mazzagatti v. Everingham by Everingham

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 1986No. 125 E.D. Appeal Docket 1985PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIX, Chief Justice.

In the instant matter we are called upon to revisit Sinn v. Burd, 486 Pa. 146, 404 A.2d 672 (1979), and to review its parameters for pleading the negligent infliction of emotion*269al distress. Specifically, appellants ask us to recognize a cause of action for the negligent infliction of emotional distress in instances where the close relative does not observe the accident itself, but instead arrives at the scene of the accident and observes the victim a few minutes afterwards. We granted allocatur to clarify our position on this point.

I

This case arose on August 12,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Pocono International Raceway, Inc. v. Pocono Produce, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. Wisniewski v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. Kazatsky v. King David Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Charles Williams v. Michael Guzzardi and Chancellor AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. Taylor v. Albert Einstein Medical CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Emerich v. Philadelphia Center for Human Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API