Legal Opinion
Nobers v. Crucible, Inc.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 19, 1994No. 452PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROWLEY, President Judge.
Are the claims stated by plaintiffs/appellants David A. Nobers et al., former employees of appellee Crucible, Inc. (“Crucible”), at its Midland, Pennsylvania, plant, 1 in their action for breach of an employment contract against Crucible and its parent company, appellee Colt Industries, Inc. (“Colt”), so related to an employee benefit plan as to be pre-empted by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq.? Concluding that they were so related, and that the courts of this Commonwealth therefore lacked subject matter jurisdiction over…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Fort Halifax Packing Co. v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Commonwealth v. NegriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Jacques v. Akzo International Salt, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Chiropractic Nutritional Associates, Inc. v. Empire Blue Cross & Blue ShieldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Cellucci v. General Motors Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Commonwealth v. GaffneySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Commonwealth v. VitaleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Jay R. Reynolds, Inc. v. Department of Labor & Industry, Prevailing Wage Appeals BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.