Legal Opinion
1975 Salaried Retirement Plan for Eligible Employees of Crucible, Inc. v. Nobers
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 6, 1992No. 91-3426PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal requires us to construe the Anti-Injunction Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2283 (1988), in the context of the Employee Retirement and Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 1001-1461 (West 1985 & Supp.1992). The plaintiff-appellants, five plans for the benefit of employees of Crucible, Inc., seek to enjoin the appellees, four employees whom Crucible laid off, from prosecuting a contract action against Crucible and its parent company, Colt Industries, Inc., in Pennsylvania state court. The district court for the Western District of Pennsylvania…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Board of Trustees of the Hotel and Restaurant Employees Local 25 and Employers' Health and Welfare Fund v. The Madison Hotel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Plumb v. Fluid Pump Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- McLain v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Cutler v. 65 Security PlanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 90,270, Pens. Plan Guide (Cch) P 23945l Frank Russell Company, Frank Russell Trust Company, Frank Russell Investment Company, and Frank Russell Investment Management Company v. Wellington Management Company, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.