Lehigh Valley R. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Criminal prosecutions against the Rehigh Valley Railroad Company the Philadelphia & Reading Railway Company, and the Bethlehem Steel Company. From a judgment of conviction in each case, the defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
YOUNG, District Judge.
All the defendants were indicted under the acts of Congress regulating commerce, as amended by the act of February 19, 1903, known as the "Elkins Act,” and as amended by the act of June 29, 1906, known as the “Hepburn Act,” in the following indictments:
The Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, hereinafter called the Le-high, at No. 23 and No. 24, March sessions, 1910. At No; 23 in 97 counts for ..failure to observe the tariff in force from April 1, 1907, by canceling and remittmg the demurrage charges upon 97 different cars delivered in interstate commerce by the Lehigh to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Bowman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Rhodes v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United States Ex Rel. Pitcairn Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- McNeill v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Fahey v. O'Melveny & Myers Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. O'Melveny & MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Iversen v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1946
- Rottenberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1943
- United States v. SlobodkinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.