Legal Opinion
United States v. Slobodkin
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 2, 1943No. 16058, 16059, 16063PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYZANSKI, District Judge.
Crim. No. 16058.
In United States v. Jacob Slobodkin, Crim. No. 16058, paragraph 1 of the defendant’s motion to quash raises the objection that the indictment is vague. That objection is overruled because the Court finds the indictment sufficiently certain. Paragraphs 2 through 5 of the defendant’s motion allege that the Emergency Price Control Act of 1942, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 901 et seq., itself (not, be it observed, any specific regulation thereunder), is invalid nnder the United States Constitution for these reasons: in violation of Article I of the United States…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lovell v. City of GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Abilene Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Smith v. CahoonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Poulos v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Commonwealth v. GeaganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Savage v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Bowles v. MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
- United States v. RenkenDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1944
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.