Legal Opinion

Iversen v. United States

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 25, 1946No. Civil Action 32098PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRETTYMAN, Justice.

Plaintiffs bring this action praying that the court set aside and enjoin the execution of certain orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission, being Third Revised Service Order No. 180, Fourth Revised Service Order No. 180, Service Order No. 394, and Service Order No. 396. These orders directed'changes in demurrage rules and charges on refrigerator cars. They recited that these cars are being delayed unduly while held for orders, loading and unloading, etc., thus impeding and diminishing the use, control, supply, movement, etc., of such cars, and that in the opinion of the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Turner, Dennis & Lowry Lumber Co. v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Pennsylvania Railroad v. Kittanning Iron & Steel Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. United States v. P. Koenig Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  5. Miller & Co. v. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad Company, Cross-Appellant v. Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  3. Baltimore and Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Central Vermont Railway, Inc., Duluth, Winnipeg and Pacific Railway, and the Detroit and Toledo Shore Line Railroad Company, Intervenors, Burlington Northern Inc. And Union Pacific Railroad Company, Intervenors, Duval Sales Corporation, International Minerals & Chemical Corporation, Evans Products Company and Pullman Leasing Company, Intervenors, the Texas Mexican Railway Company, Intervenor. Aliquippa and Southern Railroad Company v. United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Duval Sales Corporation, International Minerals & Chemical Corporation, Evans Products Company and Pullman Leasing Company, Intervenors, the Texas Mexican Railway Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  4. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Oregon Pacific Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Middle Atlantic Conference v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1972

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API