Legal Opinion
Fahey v. O'Melveny & Myers Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. O'Melveny & Myers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 17, 1952No. 12591PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BONE, Circuit Judge.
I
The essential issues presented on this appeal primarily involve and concern the status and operations of Federal Home Loan Banks. The instant appeal is from one of the many orders made by the lower court in proceedings in the so-called “consolidated cases” (“Mallonee Case” and the “Los Angeles Action”) described in our opinion in Case No. 12,511, 196 F.2d 336, entitled “Home Loan Bank Board et al. v. Mallonee et al., and consolidated case Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, et al. v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Los Angeles, et al.” For convenience wc shall hereafter…
2Cases cited107 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Fidelity Financial Corporation v. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, Milton Feinerman, President of the Federal Home Loan Bank of S.F.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Fasano v. Federal Reserve BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Pauline Rust v. Paul Johnson and Nora Johnson, City of Los Angeles v. Paul Johnson, Nora Johnson, and the Secretary of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. BalanovskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Town of Middleborough v. Housing Appeals CommitteeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.