Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Iowa

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 9, 1898No. 21PublishedCited by 181 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

The Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company was, in 1891, a common carrier, incorporated under the laws of *413Illinois, and operated among others a line of railway from Dallas, Illinois, to Burlington, Iowa, and beyond said point. The Burlington and Western Bailway Company was, at the same date, a common carrier, incorporated under the laws of Iowa, and operated'a line of railway from -Burlington, Iowa, to Oskaloosa in that State, with stations at intervening points, one of which was Brighton in Washington County. Both of •these corporations had a depot at Burlington, which they jointly…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. In Re RahrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Bowman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Hall v. DeCuirSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by181 opinions

  1. Granholm v. HealdSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Lottery CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Purity Extract & Tonic Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Clark Distilling Co. v. Western Maryland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. McDermott v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

176 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API