Legal Opinion
United States v. Lawrence John Pizzichiello
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 16, 2002No. 00-30160PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge:
Appellant raises numerous challenges to his sentence stemming from his plea of guilty to robbery affecting commerce in violation of the Hobbs Act. Specifically, appellant contends that the district court erred in ordering a two-level sentencing enhancement for obstruction of justice, in refusing to decrease the base offense level for his mitigating role in the offense, in refusing to grant downward departures on several grounds, in refusing to grant credit for good time earned while in state custody, and in awarding restitution. We conclude that these…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Jose Alfredo Maldonado, AKA ChinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Jose Fernando Garcia-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Robert E. Ladum Ronald D. Van Vliet Daniel Hong Echols Doyle Ford David C. Grigonis James R. WeaverCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Paul Frederick LaneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. David Phillips, United States of America v. David PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Francisco Campos-FuerteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. BedonieDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2004
- United States v. Maria Guadalupe Lopez-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.