Legal Opinion
United States v. Jose Alfredo Maldonado, AKA Chino
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 26, 2000No. 97-50440PublishedCited by 149 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judge:
In proceedings before the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Jose Alfredo Maldonado (“Maldonado”) pleaded guilty to conspiracy to manufacture and distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and § 841(a)(1). The district court sentenced Maldonado to 168 months in custody. Maldonado appeals his sentence, contending that: (1) the district court did not follow Rule 32(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure; (2) the district court erred by imposing a two-level role enhancement; and (3) the government breached…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Miguel Angel Flores-PayonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. William George HowardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. BenchimolSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Jane ReadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adolfo Alberto MARIN-CUEVAS, AKA Jesus Marin-Cuevas, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by149 opinions
- United States v. Ted Stevenson Angwin and Christine KhamisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Richard Wesley ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Vicente Roberto JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Allen Ray JordanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Raul Franco-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.