Legal Opinion

United States v. Phillips

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 28, 2004No. Nos. 02-30035, 02-30046PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge.

David Phillips appeals his criminal conviction for violating the Clean Water Act1 (“CWA”) and conspiring to violate the CWA. We disposed of many of Phillips’ claims in a separate memorandum disposition. In this opinion, we reject Phillips’ remaining claim: that the district court erred in refusing to dismiss the indictment for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that Fred Burr Creek (the “creek”) was not a navigable water under the CWA and in so instructing the jury. Thus, we affirm Phillips’ conviction.

We also address the Government’s contentions that the district…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  5. Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. James Daychild, United States of America v. Patrick O. NeissCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. David Phillips, United States of America v. David PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. James Lee Wright, United States of America v. Tracey Lynn WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. Adam Bros. Farming, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API