Legal Opinion
United States v. David Phillips, United States of America v. David Phillips
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 6, 2004No. 02-30035, 02-30046PublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on January 28, 2004, and cited at 356 F.3d 1086 (9th Cir.2004), is amended as follows:
1. Pages 1100-01, paragraph beginning “Phillips’ prior state prosecution,” second sentence should read:
In contrast to the defendants in Koon, [73] who endured a full trial, Phillips endured merely a post-indictment, pre-prosecution negotiation in which he agreed to pay a fine. The state agreed not to prosecute if he paid the fine, which he did.
and continuing, “Even the defendants in Koon...”
2. Page 1101, last paragraph of Section C beginning “The district court improperly,” change the…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Dobbert v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- United States v. WaknineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Robert S. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Kory Ray SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. David L. Smith, United States of America v. Herbert A. BatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Richard I. Berger, United States of America v. Richard I. BergerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.