Legal Opinion
United States v. Robert E. Ladum Ronald D. Van Vliet Daniel Hong Echols Doyle Ford David C. Grigonis James R. Weaver
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 17, 1998No. 97-30018, 97-30019, 97-30022, 97-30027, 97-30030 and 97-30044PublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion By Judge RYMER; Dissent by Judge TASHIMA.
RYMER, Circuit Judge:
Robert Ladum, Echols Ford, David Grigonis, Daniel Hong, Ronald Van Vliet, and James Weaver appeal their jury convictions and sentences on various tax fraud, bankruptcy fraud, and money laundering charges in connection with the operation of seven second-hand stores around Portland, Oregon. Their appeal raises numerous issues relating to the sufficiency of the indictment, the suppression of statements, the sufficiency of the evidence, and the district court’s sentencing determinations. In part, we must decide whether a…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- New York v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- United States of America, State of California, Intervenor v. Raphyal Crawford, AKA Aarmyl CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Chance ReardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. FregaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Abdul Daas, A/K/A Abdual DaasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. SarkisianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.