Legal Opinion
United States v. Paul Frederick Laney
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 30, 1999No. 98-10032PublishedCited by 106 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge KRAVITCH; Concurrence by Judge T.G. NELSON; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge REINHARDT.
KRAVITCH, Circuit Judge:
Defendant-appellant Paul Frederick La-ney pled guilty to three counts of conspiring to engage in and engaging in activities relating to the sexual exploitation of children. The district court sentenced him to 81 months in prison and ordered him to pay restitution to one of the conspiracy’s victims. Laney’s appeal of the sentence and the restitution order raises several issues concerning the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.” or the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Clayton Fountain, Thomas E. Silverstein, and Randy K. GometzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Robert Gerard HornCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Richard C. CrandonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- United States v. Jeremy BenderCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. David Phillips, United States of America v. David PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. MonzelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- United States v. McGarityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. NewsomeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.