Legal Opinion
The Ansul Company v. Uniroyal, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 19, 1971No. 686, 687, Dockets 34876, 34883PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUMBARD, Chief Judge:
In this patent case, plaintiffs and defendant both appeal from a judgment en*875tered on December 3, 1969 in the Southern District of New York after two non-jury trials before Judge Mansfield. Plaintiff Ansul sued for a declaratory judgment of invalidity, noninfringement, and unenforeeability of defendant Uniroyal’s United States Patent No. 2,614,-916 (the “916 patent”). Uniroyal counterclaimed for infringement of the same patent; and Ansul denied such infringement and interposed several affirmative defenses including Uniroyal’s misuse of the patent through antitrust…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Bankers Trust Company v. Daniel Rhoades, Herman Soifer and Milton BratenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- In Re Jack R. Wands, Vincent R. Zurawski, Jr., and Hubert J.P. SchoemakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Handgards, Inc., a Corporation v. Ethicon, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Studiengesellschaft Kohle Mbh, as Trustee for the Max-Planck-Institut Fur Kohlenforschung v. Eastman Kodak CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.