Legal Opinion
Skil Corp. v. Lucerne Products, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 22, 1980No. C 69-461, C 74-121PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LAMBROS, District Judge.
The consolidated cases, C 69-461 and C 74-121, sound in suit for royalties under a licensing agreement and patent infringement. The issues are centered upon two patents owned by plaintiff — U. S. Patent No. 3,209,228, in the name of Alex F. Gawron (“Gawron Patent”), titled “System For Controlling Electric Motors in Power Tools and The Like;” and U. S. Patent No. 3,260,-827 in the name of Carl J. Frenzel (“Frenzel Patent”), titled “Motor Reversing Mechanism For Electrically Powered Portable Tools.”
These consolidated cases were referred to the…
2Cases cited81 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- The Singer Company, Cross-Appellant v. Skil Corporation, Third-Party Cross-Appellee v. Lucerne Products, Inc., Third-Party Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Vas-Cath Inc. v. MahurkarDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Skil Corporation v. Lucerne Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Torin Corp. v. Philips Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
- Nilsson v. Architron Sys., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011