Legal Opinion
Fairchild Hiller Corp. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 21, 1971PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJasen, J.
The subject of this litigation is a dispute between plaintiff’s predecessor in interest, Republic Aviation Corporation (Republic), and McDonnell Aircraft Corporation, a predecessor corporation of McDonnell Douglas Corporation (McDonnell).
In May, 1962, Republic entered into an agreement with McDonnell, whereunder it agreed to manufacture for McDonnell various aircraft assemblies for the Phantom F-4 jet fighter-bomber. McDonnell was to supply the tools and drawings required to produce these assemblies. After receiving these tools and drawings, Republic claimed that there were numerous defects…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sheridan v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Allen v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Moses v. . McDivittNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Spencer v. Standard Chemicals & Metals Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Cummings v. . MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Clarkson Co. v. ShaheenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Flli Moretti Cereali S.P.A. v. Continental Grain CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Red Tulip, LLC v. NeivaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Clarkson Co., Ltd. v. ShaheenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Poloron Products, Inc. (With Substitution Applied for by Dynamark Corporation, Assignee) v. Lybrand Ross Bros. & Montgomery, and Third-Party v. Poloron Products of Indiana, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.